| AnimeTake.com | Register | Social Groups | Members List | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
(#1 (permalink))
|
(#2 (permalink))
|
(#3 (permalink))
|
(#6 (permalink))
|
(#7 (permalink))
|
(#8 (permalink))
|
|
Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Gargantuant Malus Domestica
|
No, I just wouldn't authorize intense military actions without giving a goal of when you play to cease them. I'm not saure about other countries, but the Naval force (fleet 40-something or other) is just INSANELY powerful, and when coupled with a no fly zone it is literally enough to demolish a continent. I can't see why we would need to initiate an attack like that. While they were violent, the other African and Middle Eastern countries were able to resolve their political issues in a moderately peaceful way, despite the presence of heavily armed troops. If the entirety of the UN can manage to authorize a what they have in concern to Libya, I don't see why they can't handle the situation peacefully, or at least in a moderate/controlled fashion. Not only is this approach taxing on the people who will be directly affected by it (i.e. people damaged as "collateral", just like those 26 recently killed by unmanned drones in pakistan), but the citizens of those attacking nations as well.
As I mentioned, the naval force being used by the US is HUGE, and cannot be mobilized, controlled, or utilized without heavily taxing the people of said country. In a time when the gov't is so opnely attacking unions that it could be considered a new Taft Hartley Act, and teachers as well as the schools they belong are being removed so quickly, we need all of the domestic spending we can get. A more peaceful resolution literally is better for everybody. EDT: holyshitwalloftext O_O I shouldn't think on weekends xD |
|
|
|
(#9 (permalink))
|
|
SNSD<3
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Karakura Town.
|
There is no peaceful way to solve this situation. This is what the world has been trying to achieve for weeks while failing. Qaddafi himself is a lunatic, because even though the entire UN is flexing their muscles and showing this incredible force, he is still attacking benghazi while he claims to be in ceasefire. I can't speak for the US and their fleet, whether they will use all of it, what the collateral damage will be, but these guys didn't become leaders of their respective countries because they were stupid. They will try their best to reach a resolution, but no one can sit back and wtach thousands of their fellow humans be murered when all they wished for was democracy.
EDIT: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-12795971 French jets taking action. |
|
|
|
(#10 (permalink))
|
|
Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: The Gargantuant Malus Domestica
|
=O
Well said, actually I believe that the art of peacefully resolution is dead, to be honest xD We'll see how the situation progresses, I suppose the best we can hope for is that we're in Libya just long enough to ensure stability, and then allow the country to maintain independence rather than put it in our pocket. Right now I guess I just worry that after Qaddafi is removed from power, that there's no guarantee of peace afterwards. It's huge oil reserves give me the feeling that we'll end up occupying and using it for profits rather than try to fix all of its problems asap, like we have so often before. Heres to hoping civility overcomes greed ^.^ |
|
|
|