Hopefully, this will the first of a series of discussions looking at the way anime (and manga) weave their often complex narratives.
For this inaugural thread, I have chosen a new show as the topic:
Durarara!!.
I'm going to presume that anyone who follows this thread has already watched at least a few of the episodes.
If you haven't watched it yet, I recommend doing so — whether this discussion interests you or not. It's worth the time.
Anyway: storytelling.
As I have been catching up with the latest anime shows, I have noted an interesting development in how stories in anime are related, and
Durarara!! is a prime example: recursion, a pattern of revelation that build up detail and depth by repeating parts of a story in slightly different fashion. It is an ancient approach to storytelling that has been rather uncommon in modern media, which has taken a rather single-track linearity as its presentation model. I am of the opinion that the re-emergence of a more circumspect telling improves the material, lending a gravity to the narrative that a more straight-forward telling would not only fail to imbue, but likewise even cheapen the core concepts.
This brings me to
Durarara!!.
Taken of its own, the premise of the the series is not entirely novel, even a bit cliche: a embroilment of urban highschoolers in supernatural circumstances. That phrase could describe so many anime, past and present, that it alone is almost meaningless as a description.
For the sake of avoiding spoilers, I will not go into specifics here.
What matters is how the mode of telling enriches the basics.
First and foremost,
Durarara!! has an almost stream-of-consciousness approach to its episodes. One the one hand,m this does make it a bit meandering at times, drifting from point to point naturally, but seemingly randomly. But this is framed by the story, which tends to open an episode with a critical (and often inexplicable) event, then works it way back to that event from an earlier point in time, demonstrating the interrelated nature of it all, and weaving its loosely tied characters closer together without outright tying them with hard plot points (which will likely come latter and seem perfectly appropriate thanks to this buildup).
Thus, the slightly wandering — almost documentary — approach to the story tell suits going back over events and revisiting the same scenes. The consequence is a remarkable amount of development of setting and character without too much straight exposition — and even when exposition is resorted to, it feels natural.
In retrospect, it becomes rather clear that not much has really
happened in the first five episode beyond a handful of brief, interwoven events.
Yet, the setting of the series is already becoming firmly established, seeming far more familiar and confident of its footing than a more linear approach is likely to produce over so few installments. The viewer already is gaining insights into characters and how they might affect each other directly and indirectly. Even if the outcome might prove obvious, in the end, the trip there should be
interesting as a result.
So: how do you feel about this sort of storytelling?